Kultur
2005-02-02 16:07:19 UTC
I was reading an OPERA NEWS magazine from a couple of years ago that
had an article/interview by Brian Kellow on popular movie sopranos
Kathryn Grayson, Jane Powell and Ann Blyth. Although Kellow's
commentary on each of these talented singers included some slight
reservations (e.g., he noted of Grayson's vocalism: "She was a high,
high coloratura--the Mado Robin of the movies--with a distinctively
chirpy timbre that was at times quite impressive and at others slightly
unnerving" ), he was generally highly admiring of the work and talents
of all three ladies, lauding Blyth's lyric soprano as "perhaps the most
naturally beautiful instrument" of the three, and praising Powell as
"an uncommonly bright singer whose interpretations were deeply felt."
The same magazine also included a separate sidebar "salute" titled
"Universal Appeal" by frequent OPERA NEWS contributor Eric Myers on
Deanna Durbin, the first, most popular, most critically admired of
filmdom's "Teen Sopranos."
Although Myers was readily appreciative of Durbin's popularity both in
her screen heyday and in succeeding decades (e.g., "The little girl
with the voice of a grown woman instantly captured the public's fancy,
and she remains so beloved that the fan clubs, websites and newsletters
devoted to her are too numerous to count."), he asserted that her great
poularity had little, if anything, to do with her either the quality of
her voice or her abilities as a singer/actress, seemingly finding her
considerable lack of ability/talent in both areas to be debits rather
than assets in her success:
<<What made Durbin special? The truth was, she wasn't so special.
Although trained by former Met bass Andres de Segurola, she didn't
possess the kind of vocal talent that could have launched her on a
major opera career. Her soprano, light but full, was pretty and evenly
produced without being particularly distinctive. Her interpretive
abilities tended to skim the surface--but then, she was rarely asked to
sing anything much heavier than "II Bacio" or Gounod's Ave Maria. Her
acting skills were little more than passable.>>
Rather, Myers ascribed Durbin's success solely to her considerable, and
uninquely charismatic screen presence:
<<It was really the ordinary, attractive girlishness she displayed that
won hearts all around. That quality even got her a special Academy
Award, shared in 1938 with Mickey Rooney, "for bringing to the screen
the spirit and personification of youth, and as juvenile players
setting a high standard of ability and achievement." As Durbin matured,
the attractiveness became something more. With her full lips,
voluptuous physique and caressing, dreamy way of focusing on her male
co-stars, she projected an eroticism that is rarely acknowledged by her
fans. Nowhere was this more evident than in 1944's Christmas Holiday,
her most atypical effort, in which she played a hooker in a New Orleans
cathouse. It was her sole dramatic role, and one of her own favorites.
(Durbin's beauty was also on full, flamboyant display in Can't Help
Singing, in which she got to take a bubble bath in glorious
Technicolor.)>>
In what is nominally labeled a "Salute" to Durbin, Myers' appraisal of
Durbin's talents (or lack of them as the case may be) strikes me as
fairly damming, especially considering that the periodical in which it
was published is devoted to celebrating and perpetuating the best in
operatic/classical singing traditions and talent.
Has anyone else ever read this piece, or have an opinion on Myers'
assessment of Durbin's talents, pro or con?
had an article/interview by Brian Kellow on popular movie sopranos
Kathryn Grayson, Jane Powell and Ann Blyth. Although Kellow's
commentary on each of these talented singers included some slight
reservations (e.g., he noted of Grayson's vocalism: "She was a high,
high coloratura--the Mado Robin of the movies--with a distinctively
chirpy timbre that was at times quite impressive and at others slightly
unnerving" ), he was generally highly admiring of the work and talents
of all three ladies, lauding Blyth's lyric soprano as "perhaps the most
naturally beautiful instrument" of the three, and praising Powell as
"an uncommonly bright singer whose interpretations were deeply felt."
The same magazine also included a separate sidebar "salute" titled
"Universal Appeal" by frequent OPERA NEWS contributor Eric Myers on
Deanna Durbin, the first, most popular, most critically admired of
filmdom's "Teen Sopranos."
Although Myers was readily appreciative of Durbin's popularity both in
her screen heyday and in succeeding decades (e.g., "The little girl
with the voice of a grown woman instantly captured the public's fancy,
and she remains so beloved that the fan clubs, websites and newsletters
devoted to her are too numerous to count."), he asserted that her great
poularity had little, if anything, to do with her either the quality of
her voice or her abilities as a singer/actress, seemingly finding her
considerable lack of ability/talent in both areas to be debits rather
than assets in her success:
<<What made Durbin special? The truth was, she wasn't so special.
Although trained by former Met bass Andres de Segurola, she didn't
possess the kind of vocal talent that could have launched her on a
major opera career. Her soprano, light but full, was pretty and evenly
produced without being particularly distinctive. Her interpretive
abilities tended to skim the surface--but then, she was rarely asked to
sing anything much heavier than "II Bacio" or Gounod's Ave Maria. Her
acting skills were little more than passable.>>
Rather, Myers ascribed Durbin's success solely to her considerable, and
uninquely charismatic screen presence:
<<It was really the ordinary, attractive girlishness she displayed that
won hearts all around. That quality even got her a special Academy
Award, shared in 1938 with Mickey Rooney, "for bringing to the screen
the spirit and personification of youth, and as juvenile players
setting a high standard of ability and achievement." As Durbin matured,
the attractiveness became something more. With her full lips,
voluptuous physique and caressing, dreamy way of focusing on her male
co-stars, she projected an eroticism that is rarely acknowledged by her
fans. Nowhere was this more evident than in 1944's Christmas Holiday,
her most atypical effort, in which she played a hooker in a New Orleans
cathouse. It was her sole dramatic role, and one of her own favorites.
(Durbin's beauty was also on full, flamboyant display in Can't Help
Singing, in which she got to take a bubble bath in glorious
Technicolor.)>>
In what is nominally labeled a "Salute" to Durbin, Myers' appraisal of
Durbin's talents (or lack of them as the case may be) strikes me as
fairly damming, especially considering that the periodical in which it
was published is devoted to celebrating and perpetuating the best in
operatic/classical singing traditions and talent.
Has anyone else ever read this piece, or have an opinion on Myers'
assessment of Durbin's talents, pro or con?